Dr. Finck says she that she felt understanding on the part of her colleagues who stayed in academics and clinical practice when she left, and she credits the physicians who transitioned from academic rheumatology to industry before her for smoothing the way. “People gave them a tough time and looked at them as turncoats,” she says, adding that when she left, it was understood that she did so because of the grant situation. “We looked up to them, and I hope the generation that comes after ours looks up to us in the same way.”
Mary Desmond Pinkowish is a medical journalist based in New York.
Thinking About Industry?
Advice from Physicians Who Made the Move
The physicians we interviewed have several pieces of advice for their colleagues who are considering a move to industry—or trying to figure out if they are suited to this type of professional life. “It’s a good transition to consider if you like the practical aspects of new drug development and bringing these drugs to patients,” says Dr. Siegel. He adds that, unlike academic medicine, industry work involves lots of adherence to large-scale, high-quality process. “All of your documentation must be consistent, because the FDA will go over all the records with a fine-tooth comb. Even if the drug has been shown to be safe and effective, it may not get approved if there are problems with the documentation. You need to be comfortable working with the groups responsible for this documentation,” says Dr. Siegel.
Dr. Davis recommends spending time doing the research that will allow you to answer the question, “Is this for me?”
“Learn as much as possible about the industry, as well as individual companies,” says Dr. Davis. “Be open, and talk to as many physicians as possible with different positions inside these companies,” he adds.
“There are so many possible roles for physicians, including early development, late development, regulatory affairs, drug safety, and clinical operations,” Dr. Davis points out, adding that it’s beneficial to speak with people in several areas to determine which particular area might be a good match for your interests and experience.
Dr. Davis also recommends speaking to people in small, midsize, and large companies. Each will have a distinct culture, he says, as well as a distinct approach to risk in drug development. Dr. Siegel agrees, adding that it’s worth carefully investigating whether a specific company specializes in particular disease classes or tilts towards innovative drug development as opposed to working with established drug classes. On both counts, the company’s goals should mirror your own interests and expertise.
Related Articles
A Regulatory Leader in Rheumatology
Jeffrey Siegel, MD: A rare combination of clinical scientist and regulatory collaborator
Paul Davis, MD, Steps Down as Editor-in-Chief of Clinical Rheumatology
Dr. Davis’ eight-year tenure at the international rheumatology journal marked by growth in number of submitted manuscripts, international reach, and global impact
Fall 2021’s Awards, Appointments & Announcements in Rheumatology
Jeffrey Siegel, MD, Assumes New Position as Director for New Office of Drug Evaluation Sciences at the FDA On Feb. 16, Jeffrey Siegel, MD, became the director of the recently created Office of Drug Evaluation Sciences at the U.S. Food & Drug Administration (FDA). The move, he says, “puts together many of the different things…
Beyond Awareness: August Is Psoriasis Action Month
This month, the National Psoriasis Foundation is urging patients and rheumatologists to take charge of psoriatic disease by setting ambitious treatment goals to achieve better health outcomes…