Video: Every Case Tells a Story| Webinar: ACR/CHEST ILD Guidelines in Practice

An official publication of the ACR and the ARP serving rheumatologists and rheumatology professionals

  • Conditions
    • Axial Spondyloarthritis
    • Gout and Crystalline Arthritis
    • Myositis
    • Osteoarthritis and Bone Disorders
    • Pain Syndromes
    • Pediatric Conditions
    • Psoriatic Arthritis
    • Rheumatoid Arthritis
    • Sjögren’s Disease
    • Systemic Lupus Erythematosus
    • Systemic Sclerosis
    • Vasculitis
    • Other Rheumatic Conditions
  • FocusRheum
    • ANCA-Associated Vasculitis
    • Axial Spondyloarthritis
    • Gout
    • Psoriatic Arthritis
    • Rheumatoid Arthritis
    • Systemic Lupus Erythematosus
  • Guidance
    • Clinical Criteria/Guidelines
    • Ethics
    • Legal Updates
    • Legislation & Advocacy
    • Meeting Reports
      • ACR Convergence
      • Other ACR meetings
      • EULAR/Other
    • Research Rheum
  • Drug Updates
    • Analgesics
    • Biologics/DMARDs
  • Practice Support
    • Billing/Coding
    • EMRs
    • Facility
    • Insurance
    • QA/QI
    • Technology
    • Workforce
  • Opinion
    • Patient Perspective
    • Profiles
    • Rheuminations
      • Video
    • Speak Out Rheum
  • Career
    • ACR ExamRheum
    • Awards
    • Career Development
  • ACR
    • ACR Home
    • ACR Convergence
    • ACR Guidelines
    • Journals
      • ACR Open Rheumatology
      • Arthritis & Rheumatology
      • Arthritis Care & Research
    • From the College
    • Events/CME
    • President’s Perspective
  • Search

ACR Updates COVID-19 Clinical Guidance for Adult Patients

From the College  |  Issue: May 2020, September 2020  |  July 21, 2020

Active Inflammatory Arthritis:

  • For patients well controlled on hydroxychloroquine or chloroquine, this disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drug (DMARD) should be continued, when available; when unable to access (including in patients with active or newly diagnosed disease), switching to a different conventional synthetic DMARD (csDMARD) (either as monotherapy or as part of combination therapy) should be considered (M/H).
  • For patients well controlled on an IL-6 inhibitor, this DMARD should be continued, when available; when unable to access the agent, switching to a different biologic should be considered (M). The panel noted uncertainty regarding the use of JAK inhibitors in this situation.
  • For patients with moderate to high disease activity despite optimal csDMARDs, biologics may be started (H). The panel noted uncertainty regarding the use of JAK inhibitors in this situation.
  • For active or newly diagnosed inflammatory arthritis, csDMARDs may be started or switched (M).
  • If indicated, low-dose glucocorticoids (≤10 mg prednisone equivalent) or NSAIDs may be started (M/H).

Other Rheumatic Diseases:

ad goes here:advert-1
ADVERTISEMENT
SCROLL TO CONTINUE
  • In patients with systemic inflammatory or vital organ-threatening disease (e.g., lupus nephritis or vasculitis), high-dose glucocorticoids or immunosuppressants may be initiated (M).
  • In patients with newly diagnosed Sjögren’s syndrome, given the paucity of data proving efficacy, hydroxy­chloroquine or chloroquine should not be started (M).

For ongoing treatment of stable patients following SARS-CoV-2 exposure (without symptoms related to COVID-19):

  • Hydroxychloroquine, sulfasalazine and NSAIDs may be continued (M/H).
  • Other immunosuppressants, non-IL-6 biologics and JAK inhibitors should be stopped temporarily, pending a negative test result for COVID-19 or after two weeks of symptom-free observation (M). The panel noted uncertainty regarding temporarily stopping methotrexate or leflunomide in this situation.
  • In select circumstances, as part of a shared decision-making process, IL-6 inhibitors may be continued (M).

For rheumatic disease treatment in the context of documented or presumptive COVID-19 infection:

ad goes here:advert-2
ADVERTISEMENT
SCROLL TO CONTINUE
  • Regardless of COVID-19 severity, antimalarial therapies (hydroxy­chloroquine or chloroquine) may be continued, but sulfasalazine, methotrexate, leflunomide, immunosuppressants, non-IL-6 biologics and JAK inhibitors should be stopped or held (M/H).
  • For patients with severe respiratory symptoms, NSAIDs should be stopped (M). The panel demonstrated low consensus with regard to stopping NSAIDs in the absence of severe symptoms.
  • In select circumstances, as part of a shared decision-making process, IL-6 inhibitors may be continued (M).

Reinitiating treatment following COVID-19:

  • For patients with uncomplicated COVID-19 infections (characterized by mild or no pneumonia and treated in the ambulatory setting or via self-quarantine), consideration may be given to restarting rheumatic disease treatments (e.g., DMARDs, immunosuppressants, biologics and JAK inhibitors) within seven to 14 days of symptom resolution. For patients who have a positive PCR test for SARS-CoV-2, but are (and remain) asymptomatic, consideration may be given to restarting rheumatic disease treatments (e.g., DMARDs, immunosuppressants, biologics and JAK inhibitors) 10 to 17 days after the PCR test is reported as positive (H).
  • Decisions regarding the timing of reinitiating rheumatic disease therapies in patients recovering from more severe COVID-19-related illness should be made on a case-by-case basis (H).

Bottom Line
These statements are not intended to replace clinical judgment. Modifications made to treatment plans, particularly in complex rheumatic disease patients, are highly disease, patient, geography and time specific, and, therefore, must be individualized as part of a shared decision-making process. This guidance is provided as part of a living document, recognizing rapidly evolving evidence and the anticipated need for frequent updates as such evidence becomes available.

Page: 1 2 3 | Single Page
Share: 

Filed under:Clinical Criteria/GuidelinesConditions Tagged with:COVID-19

Related Articles
    nukeaf / shutterstock.com

    The History of Treating Lupus with Hydroxychloroquine

    June 15, 2020

    Given how unexpectedly front and center hydroxychloroquine has been in discussions about the treatment of COVID-19 this year, it makes sense to look at how it became so central to the treatment of a rheumatologic condition. In 1991, an article appeared in The New England Journal of Medicine that would alter the way rheumatologists approached…

    Ocular Disease Monitoring Critical to Avoid Retinal Toxicity from Hydroxychloroquine

    November 16, 2016

    Both due to its efficacy and favorable side effect profile when compared with alternative drugs for rheumatologic conditions, hydroxychloroquine is an important agent in rheumatologists’ armamentarium. However, one barrier to hydroxychloroquine use can be its effects on the eye (also see “Revised Retinopathy Screening Guidelines,”). Ocular side effects of hydroxychloroquine can include impact on the…

    The COVID-19 Pandemic: What You Should Know

    April 20, 2020

    Two rheumatologists offer advice on patient management during the COVID-19 pandemic.

    JAK Inhibitors: Are All Promises Fulfilled?

    July 22, 2022

    A decade after JAK inhibitors were approved, this EULAR 2022 session looks at whether the drugs have lived up to expectations.

  • About Us
  • Meet the Editors
  • Issue Archives
  • Contribute
  • Advertise
  • Contact Us
  • Copyright © 2025 by John Wiley & Sons, Inc. All rights reserved, including rights for text and data mining and training of artificial technologies or similar technologies. ISSN 1931-3268 (print). ISSN 1931-3209 (online).
  • DEI Statement
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Use
  • Cookie Preferences