Video: Every Case Tells a Story| Webinar: ACR/CHEST ILD Guidelines in Practice

An official publication of the ACR and the ARP serving rheumatologists and rheumatology professionals

  • Conditions
    • Axial Spondyloarthritis
    • Gout and Crystalline Arthritis
    • Myositis
    • Osteoarthritis and Bone Disorders
    • Pain Syndromes
    • Pediatric Conditions
    • Psoriatic Arthritis
    • Rheumatoid Arthritis
    • Sjögren’s Disease
    • Systemic Lupus Erythematosus
    • Systemic Sclerosis
    • Vasculitis
    • Other Rheumatic Conditions
  • FocusRheum
    • ANCA-Associated Vasculitis
    • Axial Spondyloarthritis
    • Gout
    • Psoriatic Arthritis
    • Rheumatoid Arthritis
    • Systemic Lupus Erythematosus
  • Guidance
    • Clinical Criteria/Guidelines
    • Ethics
    • Legal Updates
    • Legislation & Advocacy
    • Meeting Reports
      • ACR Convergence
      • Other ACR meetings
      • EULAR/Other
    • Research Rheum
  • Drug Updates
    • Analgesics
    • Biologics/DMARDs
  • Practice Support
    • Billing/Coding
    • EMRs
    • Facility
    • Insurance
    • QA/QI
    • Technology
    • Workforce
  • Opinion
    • Patient Perspective
    • Profiles
    • Rheuminations
      • Video
    • Speak Out Rheum
  • Career
    • ACR ExamRheum
    • Awards
    • Career Development
  • ACR
    • ACR Home
    • ACR Convergence
    • ACR Guidelines
    • Journals
      • ACR Open Rheumatology
      • Arthritis & Rheumatology
      • Arthritis Care & Research
    • From the College
    • Events/CME
    • President’s Perspective
  • Search

Ethical Concerns Influence What Constitutes Clear and Full Disclosure for Physicians

Bernard Rubin, DO, MPH  |  Issue: December 2012  |  December 1, 2012

Second, should the ACR standard for disclosure apply just to ACR CME activities or to all members who present CME lectures in any venue?

Third, your knowledge of the relationship between the speaker and industry leads you to think that, for some reason, the speaker has a motive to avoid full disclosure. What, if anything, is he trying to hide, and do you have an obligation to address your concerns with the speaker or the hospital sponsoring the CME activity?

ad goes here:advert-1
ADVERTISEMENT
SCROLL TO CONTINUE

Finally, do your misgivings about this speaker challenge the value of CME lectures in general, or do they reflect negatively only on this hospital and/or this speaker?

What are your thoughts on or reactions to this scenario? Please send your comments or questions to [email protected], and we will publish some of your responses in a future “Ethics Forum.”

ad goes here:advert-2
ADVERTISEMENT
SCROLL TO CONTINUE

Dr. Rubin is clinical professor of medicine at Wayne State University School of Medicine and division head of rheumatology at Henry Ford Hospital, both in in Detroit.

Page: 1 2 | Single Page
Share: 

Filed under:Career DevelopmentConditionsEducation & TrainingEthicsProfessional TopicsPsoriatic Arthritis Tagged with:AC&RAmerican College of Rheumatology (ACR)disclosureEthicsmedical practicepatient carepatient communicationPsoriatic Arthritisrheumatologisttransparency

Related Articles

    Ethics Forum: A Physician’s Medical Error & the Patient’s Right to Know

    October 17, 2017

    Case Ms. A is an 82-year-old woman who presented to the rheumatology office for evaluation of osteoporosis. She had been diagnosed with postmenopausal osteoporosis at age 62 after sustaining a right wrist fracture. She was started on alendronate 70 mg weekly and reported medication compliance. At age 79, she sustained an atraumatic right femur fracture….

    Cost of a Free Lunch

    May 1, 2007

    Much is made of pharma’s influence on CME—but do we really know what this educational funding buys?

    What the Physician Payment Sunshine Act & Open Payments Database Mean in Practice

    January 1, 2015

    Revised CMS policy on payments, transfers of value to physicians incorporates exemption for continuing medical education

    Updated ACP Ethics Manual Provides 6-Step Approach to Dilemmas

    January 15, 2019

    NEW YORK (Reuters Health)—The 2019 edition of the American College of Physicians (ACP) ethics manual provides a six-step approach to resolving ethical dilemmas and adds or expands sections that address emerging issues in 21st century medicine.1 “The Manual provides succinct guidance on issues that affect the patient-physician relationship, and also issues that have to do…

  • About Us
  • Meet the Editors
  • Issue Archives
  • Contribute
  • Advertise
  • Contact Us
  • Copyright © 2025 by John Wiley & Sons, Inc. All rights reserved, including rights for text and data mining and training of artificial technologies or similar technologies. ISSN 1931-3268 (print). ISSN 1931-3209 (online).
  • DEI Statement
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Use
  • Cookie Preferences