Video: Every Case Tells a Story| Webinar: ACR/CHEST ILD Guidelines in Practice

An official publication of the ACR and the ARP serving rheumatologists and rheumatology professionals

  • Conditions
    • Axial Spondyloarthritis
    • Gout and Crystalline Arthritis
    • Myositis
    • Osteoarthritis and Bone Disorders
    • Pain Syndromes
    • Pediatric Conditions
    • Psoriatic Arthritis
    • Rheumatoid Arthritis
    • Sjögren’s Disease
    • Systemic Lupus Erythematosus
    • Systemic Sclerosis
    • Vasculitis
    • Other Rheumatic Conditions
  • FocusRheum
    • ANCA-Associated Vasculitis
    • Axial Spondyloarthritis
    • Gout
    • Psoriatic Arthritis
    • Rheumatoid Arthritis
    • Systemic Lupus Erythematosus
  • Guidance
    • Clinical Criteria/Guidelines
    • Ethics
    • Legal Updates
    • Legislation & Advocacy
    • Meeting Reports
      • ACR Convergence
      • Other ACR meetings
      • EULAR/Other
    • Research Rheum
  • Drug Updates
    • Analgesics
    • Biologics/DMARDs
  • Practice Support
    • Billing/Coding
    • EMRs
    • Facility
    • Insurance
    • QA/QI
    • Technology
    • Workforce
  • Opinion
    • Patient Perspective
    • Profiles
    • Rheuminations
      • Video
    • Speak Out Rheum
  • Career
    • ACR ExamRheum
    • Awards
    • Career Development
  • ACR
    • ACR Home
    • ACR Convergence
    • ACR Guidelines
    • Journals
      • ACR Open Rheumatology
      • Arthritis & Rheumatology
      • Arthritis Care & Research
    • From the College
    • Events/CME
    • President’s Perspective
  • Search

Rheumatoid Arthritis Therapy Update: What’s Changed & What’s the Same

Kimberly Retzlaff  |  Issue: May 2020  |  May 15, 2020

Biologics

Biologic therapies have been available for clinical use since 1998, Dr. Weinblatt said. A key concern with drugs that block tumor necrosis factor (TNF), or anti-TNF therapy, is the risk of flare after withdrawal.

Several studies show that patients taking a biologic and who do well for six to nine months but then abruptly stop treatment, the majority experience a disease flare. More concerning, in one study that looked at withdrawal specifically, 15% of patients were unable to get back to low disease activity after restarting therapy.2 Instead of abandoning treatment, it may be better to have patients who are doing well reduce their dose or extend the time between doses, Dr. Weinblatt said.

ad goes here:advert-1
ADVERTISEMENT
SCROLL TO CONTINUE

The risk of infection—in some cases, serious infections or hospitalization—with biologic therapy is well established. The use of corticosteroids—with or without anti-TNF therapy—is known to increase infection risk. For this reason, Dr. Weinblatt said, it’s important to get patients on as low a dose as possible of steroids or to get them off steroids all together.

Regarding the risk of major adverse cardio­vascular events, a January 2020 study in Arthritis & Rheumatology concluded there was no increased risk among patients taking tocilizumab compared with etanercept.3

ad goes here:advert-2
ADVERTISEMENT
SCROLL TO CONTINUE

“This is reassuring for patients and clinicians,” Dr. Weinblatt said.

JAK Inhibitors

Jakinibs are a relatively new class of anti-rheumatic drugs that started being used clinically about eight years ago. Three Jakinibs are currently approved for use in the U.S.—tofacitinib, baricitinib and upadacitinib—with several more in development. Some of the perks are that Jakinibs are oral drugs, and “they work very fast, within a week,” said Dr. Weinblatt. “If you’re not better in eight weeks, they won’t work.”

The most recently approved Jakinib, upada­citinib, beat adalimumab in patients on background methotrexate in one randomized, blinded study, Dr. Weinblatt said.4 “This is the first time we’ve seen that: A JAK inhibitor plus methotrexate at the labeled dose in the [U.S.] beat adalimumab plus methotrexate statistically,” he added.

As with biologic therapies, Jakinibs have a known risk of infection—in particular, herpes zoster, which is hoped to be mitigated by the new shingles vaccine, although this needs to be studied, Dr. Weinblatt said. Other potential side effects include neutropenia, anemia, increased serum creatinine, liver function abnormalities, malignancy and, possibly, deep vein thrombosis (DVT) and pulmonary embolism (PE).

“The area of most concern now is this issue about leg clots and lung clots,” which first came to light in an April 2018 U.S. Food & Drug Administration (FDA) review of baricitinib, Dr. Weinblatt said. Information from Pfizer and the European Medicines Agency suggests older patients are particularly vulnerable.5-7

“What we know is that DVT and PE may be associated with use of selective JAK inhibitors—not all of them—but we don’t know what the mechanism behind it is,” Dr. Weinblatt said.

Page: 1 2 3 4 | Single Page
Share: 

Filed under:Biologics/DMARDsConditionsRheumatoid Arthritis Tagged with:costsjanus kinase inhibitorMethotrexateWinter Rheumatology Summit

Related Articles

    The Great Debate: Should Jakinibs Be Used Before Biologics after Methotrexate Failure in RA?

    November 9, 2020

    ACR CONVERGENCE 2020—In many ways, the current plethora of treatment options for rheumatoid arthritis patients represents an embarrassment of riches. However, while many therapeutics approved by the U.S. Food & Drug Administration (FDA) are available, knowing the order in which to try these medications with patients can be quite challenging. In The Great Debate, held…

    Old Drugs Can Learn New Tricks

    November 1, 2011

    Methotrexate and its mechanism of action

    2014 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting: Methotrexate Use in Patients with RA

    April 1, 2015

    Review of clinical research on methotrexate therapy, effect on patients’ functionality, tolerability, adverse events

    Biosimilars Debate Heats up over Cost Savings, Safety Concerns

    Biosimilars Debate Heats up over Cost Savings, Safety Concerns

    April 15, 2016

    After years of speculation about potential cost savings and debates on safety, biosimilars are about to step onto the stage of rheumatic disease treatment. On Feb. 9, the Arthritis Advisory Committee of the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) met in Washington, D.C., and recommended the approval of CT-P13, a proposed biosimilar to infliximab (Remicade),…

  • About Us
  • Meet the Editors
  • Issue Archives
  • Contribute
  • Advertise
  • Contact Us
  • Copyright © 2025 by John Wiley & Sons, Inc. All rights reserved, including rights for text and data mining and training of artificial technologies or similar technologies. ISSN 1931-3268 (print). ISSN 1931-3209 (online).
  • DEI Statement
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Use
  • Cookie Preferences