Video: Every Case Tells a Story| Webinar: ACR/CHEST ILD Guidelines in Practice

An official publication of the ACR and the ARP serving rheumatologists and rheumatology professionals

  • Conditions
    • Axial Spondyloarthritis
    • Gout and Crystalline Arthritis
    • Myositis
    • Osteoarthritis and Bone Disorders
    • Pain Syndromes
    • Pediatric Conditions
    • Psoriatic Arthritis
    • Rheumatoid Arthritis
    • Sjögren’s Disease
    • Systemic Lupus Erythematosus
    • Systemic Sclerosis
    • Vasculitis
    • Other Rheumatic Conditions
  • FocusRheum
    • ANCA-Associated Vasculitis
    • Axial Spondyloarthritis
    • Gout
    • Psoriatic Arthritis
    • Rheumatoid Arthritis
    • Systemic Lupus Erythematosus
  • Guidance
    • Clinical Criteria/Guidelines
    • Ethics
    • Legal Updates
    • Legislation & Advocacy
    • Meeting Reports
      • ACR Convergence
      • Other ACR meetings
      • EULAR/Other
    • Research Rheum
  • Drug Updates
    • Analgesics
    • Biologics/DMARDs
  • Practice Support
    • Billing/Coding
    • EMRs
    • Facility
    • Insurance
    • QA/QI
    • Technology
    • Workforce
  • Opinion
    • Patient Perspective
    • Profiles
    • Rheuminations
      • Video
    • Speak Out Rheum
  • Career
    • ACR ExamRheum
    • Awards
    • Career Development
  • ACR
    • ACR Home
    • ACR Convergence
    • ACR Guidelines
    • Journals
      • ACR Open Rheumatology
      • Arthritis & Rheumatology
      • Arthritis Care & Research
    • From the College
    • Events/CME
    • President’s Perspective
  • Search

Rituximab Maintenance Study: Is Fixed-Schedule or Tailored Dosing Best?

Kurt Ullman  |  Issue: December 2018  |  December 17, 2018

Dr. Gaffo

Dr. Gaffo

Dr. Gaffo did express some concerns. Because of the pragmatic nature of the study, a few imbalances occurred in the randomization assignments. In addition, “There may be some controversy because the 500 mg of rituximab dosing strategy they chose may not be representative of what everyone does,” he says. “Many centers use a 1,000 mg dose protocol.”

One of the messages for everyday practice is that maintenance strategies for rituximab continue to prove quite effective. They probably should be preferred over regimens that prescribe traditional agents, he says.

ad goes here:advert-1
ADVERTISEMENT
SCROLL TO CONTINUE

“The second important lesson is that basing maintenance strategies on monitoring ANCA and/or CD19+ B cells is a promising method to expose patients to less drug,” said Dr. Gaffo. “This in turn could decrease the cost of treatment while also keeping up effectiveness and keeping patients in remission.”  


Kurt Ullman has been a freelance writer for more than 30 years and a contributing writer to The Rheumatologist for more than 10 years.

ad goes here:advert-2
ADVERTISEMENT
SCROLL TO CONTINUE

Does Rituximab Beat Azathioprine?

MAINRITSAN2 confirms rituximab is the best treatment to maintain AAV remission, says Dr. Charles.

Dr. Pagnoux

Dr. Pagnoux

Christian Pagnoux, MD, MPH, MSc, a rheumatologist at Mount Sinai Hospital and associate professor at the University of Toronto in Canada, notes that an earlier study by the same group in 2014 showed rituximab was superior to conventional maintenance treatment with azathioprine at preventing relapses of patients with GPA or MPA, but rituximab does not have regulatory approval for maintenance in those rare diseases.2

For now, most patients are left with conventional maintenance treatments with azathioprine or methotrexate after remission, says Dr. Pagnoux, who was involved in the first, but not this second, MAINRITSAN trial. “Some [patients] have drug coverage plans that allow rituximab for maintenance, or they pay out of pocket to receive rituximab maintenance reinfusions.

“The good (and reassuring) news from MAINRITSAN2 is that those patients can be treated with rituximab 500 mg reinfusions based on their serial ANCA titers and CD19+ B cell counts, if thoroughly monitored and measured every three months,” Dr. Pagnoux says.


Catherine Kolonko is a medical writer based in Oregon.

References

  1. Charles P, Terrier B, Perrodeau É, et al. Comparison of individually tailored versus fixed-schedule rituximab regimen to maintain ANCA-associated vasculitis remission: Results of a multicentre, randomised controlled, phase III trial (MAINRITSAN2). Ann Rheum Dis. 2018 Aug;77(8):1143–1149.
  2. Pugnet G, Pagnoux C, Terrier B, et al. Rituximab versus azathioprine for ANCA-associated vasculitis maintenance therapy: Impact on global disability and health-related quality of life. Clin Exp Rheumatol. 2016 May–Jun;34(3 Suppl 97):S54–S59.

Page: 1 2 3 4 | Single Page
Share: 

Filed under:Research RheumVasculitis Tagged with:ANCA-Associated VasculitisMAINRITSAN2maintenancerituximab

Related Articles

    Maintenance of Remission in ANCA-Associated Vasculitis

    September 5, 2012

    Relapses are common, but difficult to predict and prevent.

    AAV Remission Study: Does Rituximab or Azathioprine Work Best?

    December 17, 2018

    Researchers sought to identify predictors of patients with anti-neutrophil cytoplasmic antibody (ANCA) associated vasculitis (AAV) who took rituximab for maintenance had a better sustained remission rate through 60 months than those taking azathioprine, according to the latest results from the maintenance of remission using rituximab in systemic ANCA-associated vasculitis (MAINRITSAN) trial, a prospective, randomized trial…

    Vasculitis Guidelines in Focus, Part 2: ANCA-Associated Vasculitis

    September 9, 2021

    Sharon Chung, MD, MAS, discusses specific recommendations for the treatment and management of ANCA-associated vasculitis from the latest ACR Guideline.

    ACR Winter Rheumatology Symposium: Tips for ANCA Testing

    May 1, 2013

    How to select the correct testing method and interpret conflicting results from antineutrophil cytoplasmic antibody tests

  • About Us
  • Meet the Editors
  • Issue Archives
  • Contribute
  • Advertise
  • Contact Us
  • Copyright © 2025 by John Wiley & Sons, Inc. All rights reserved, including rights for text and data mining and training of artificial technologies or similar technologies. ISSN 1931-3268 (print). ISSN 1931-3209 (online).
  • DEI Statement
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Use
  • Cookie Preferences