Video: Every Case Tells a Story| Webinar: ACR/CHEST ILD Guidelines in Practice

An official publication of the ACR and the ARP serving rheumatologists and rheumatology professionals

  • Conditions
    • Axial Spondyloarthritis
    • Gout and Crystalline Arthritis
    • Myositis
    • Osteoarthritis and Bone Disorders
    • Pain Syndromes
    • Pediatric Conditions
    • Psoriatic Arthritis
    • Rheumatoid Arthritis
    • Sjögren’s Disease
    • Systemic Lupus Erythematosus
    • Systemic Sclerosis
    • Vasculitis
    • Other Rheumatic Conditions
  • FocusRheum
    • ANCA-Associated Vasculitis
    • Axial Spondyloarthritis
    • Gout
    • Psoriatic Arthritis
    • Rheumatoid Arthritis
    • Systemic Lupus Erythematosus
  • Guidance
    • Clinical Criteria/Guidelines
    • Ethics
    • Legal Updates
    • Legislation & Advocacy
    • Meeting Reports
      • ACR Convergence
      • Other ACR meetings
      • EULAR/Other
    • Research Rheum
  • Drug Updates
    • Analgesics
    • Biologics/DMARDs
  • Practice Support
    • Billing/Coding
    • EMRs
    • Facility
    • Insurance
    • QA/QI
    • Technology
    • Workforce
  • Opinion
    • Patient Perspective
    • Profiles
    • Rheuminations
      • Video
    • Speak Out Rheum
  • Career
    • ACR ExamRheum
    • Awards
    • Career Development
  • ACR
    • ACR Home
    • ACR Convergence
    • ACR Guidelines
    • Journals
      • ACR Open Rheumatology
      • Arthritis & Rheumatology
      • Arthritis Care & Research
    • From the College
    • Events/CME
    • President’s Perspective
  • Search

Factors that Influence Biologic Therapy Choices for Patients with Rheumatoid Arthritis

Michele B. Kaufman, PharmD, BCGP  |  Issue: March 2017  |  March 20, 2017

The findings showed that 34% of patients (34.1%) had at least one interaction, while 25.1% had at least one drug–drug interaction. Also, 10.7% of patients who had a drug–drug interaction involved a nonprescription drug. Sixteen percent of patients had a potential drug–disease interaction, with at least 37% of those reactions involving a nonprescription drug.

Non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) and anti-hypertensive agents were the most common drug–drug interaction. Aspirin/NSAID use in patients with a history of peptic ulcer disease without the use of gastro-protection (4.3%) was the most common drug–disease interaction. Having a history of falls or fractures and taking one of five central nervous system medication classes (4%; e.g., anticonvulsants, antipsychotics, SSRIs, TCAs, benzodiazepine receptor agonists) was the second most common drug–disease interaction.

ad goes here:advert-1
ADVERTISEMENT
SCROLL TO CONTINUE

Two factors were associated with drug interactions: a history of hospitalization in the prior year and the number of medications used. The use of each prescription drug raised the likelihood of having at least one type of drug interaction by 35–40%. In patients with a prior hospitalization, hospitalization raised the odds of having at least one type of drug interaction by 49–84%.

The authors write that the ability to generalize this study to the older U.S. population may be limited because the study participants did not have mobility issues, heart failure or chronic kidney disease. Thus, the rate of drug interactions observed in this study may be low. More research is needed in this area, especially in patients with more comorbidities.

ad goes here:advert-2
ADVERTISEMENT
SCROLL TO CONTINUE

Older patients were more likely to be prescribed abatacept & tocilizumab compared with patients receiving a TNFi.

Piclidenoson Studied in Autoimmune Diseases

Piclidenoson is an oral, A3 adenosine receptor antagonist (A3AR) currently in clinical trials for autoimmune diseases, including psoriasis (Phase 2/3) and rheumatoid arthritis (RA).4 This agent was developed and is being investigated as a first-line therapy and replacement for methotrexate, the current standard of care for RA.

Phase 2 clinical trials for RA are completed. Piclidenoson is scheduled to enter Phase 3 trials this year for both RA and psoriasis. ACRobat, a Phase 3 randomized, double-blind, active and placebo-controlled clinical trial of piclidenoson, has begun patient enrollment for 500 patients in Europe, Canada and the U.S.

The Phase 3 study’s primary endpoint is a decrease in disease activity score (DAS) after Week 12 of treatment with 1 mg or 2 mg piclidenoson given twice daily compared with weekly doses of methotrexate and placebo. Secondary endpoints will include ACR20, ACR50 and ACR70 scores.5 The total study duration will be 24 weeks to provide additional data on long-term efficacy and safety.

Page: 1 2 3 | Single Page
Share: 

Filed under:ConditionsDrug UpdatesRheumatoid Arthritis Tagged with:biologic therapiesdrugMedicationpatient carephysicianRheumatic DiseaseRheumatoid arthritisrheumatologistrheumatology

Related Articles

    Piclidenoson in Trials for Psoriasis & RA; Plus Duzallo Approved in Europe

    September 18, 2018

    New clinical trials are underway to determine the safety and efficacy of piclidenoson for patients with plaque psoriasis and rheumatoid arthritis…

    FDA Considers Tocilizumab for GCA & Piclidenoson Enters Phase 3 Trial for RA, Psoriasis

    February 27, 2017

    The FDA is considering a supplemental biologics license application for tocilizumab to treat giant cell arteritis…

    Physician’s Choice: Factors That Influence First- & Second-Line Biologic Therapy in RA Patients

    February 20, 2017

    In patients with RA, age and higher rates of comorbidity are influential in selecting and changing treatments…

    Sarilumab Approval Stalled; Piclidenoson Promising for Psoriasis

    November 16, 2016

    Due to manufacturing deficiencies found during a routine inspection by the FDA, approval of sarilumab for treating RA has slowed until facility issues are resolved…

  • About Us
  • Meet the Editors
  • Issue Archives
  • Contribute
  • Advertise
  • Contact Us
  • Copyright © 2025 by John Wiley & Sons, Inc. All rights reserved, including rights for text and data mining and training of artificial technologies or similar technologies. ISSN 1931-3268 (print). ISSN 1931-3209 (online).
  • DEI Statement
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Use
  • Cookie Preferences